Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
Ocultar
Mostrar todos
Alien como arena de disputa cultural: tecnología, capitalismo y otredad
Resumen
En este trabajo se analizan distintas interpretaciones de la franquicia Alien y cómo dividen al mundo respecto a temas como la explotación económica, la tecnología y la otredad. La sociología cultural permite comprender cómo las interpretaciones se articulan a través de conjuntos binarios que ven al mismo tiempo la franquicia como una crítica y una apología de: a) el racionalismo capitalista colonial y tecnológico, b) la exclusión del otro y lo monstruoso, y c) el feminismo, la identidad sexual y de género. Las interpretaciones se analizan como condensaciones sobre las esperanzas y los temores en relación con los procesos sociales contemporáneos. La disputa por el control del sentido de Alien permite comprender cómo se articulan los temores y las esperanzas sobre la racionalidad económica y tecnológica y sobre las relaciones de género.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Addison-Smith, H. (2005). E. T. Go Home: Indigeneity, Multiculturalism and “Homeland” in Contemporary Science Fiction Cinema. Papers: Explorations into Children’s Literature, 15(1), 27-35. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.301052323831903
Alexander, J. (2019). Sociología cultural. Formas de clasificación en las sociedades complejas. México: FLACSO México.
Alexander, J. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balinisteanu, T. (2012). Goddess Cults in Techno-Worlds: Tank Girl and the Borg Queen. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 28(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.28.1.5
Barker, M.; Egan, K.; Phillips, T. y Ralph, S. (2016). Alien Audiences: Remembering and Evaluating a Classic Movie. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blackmore, T. (1996). Is this going to be another bug-hunt? S-F tradition versus biology-as-destiny in James Cameron’s Aliens. Journal of Popular Culture, 29(4), 211-226. https://www.proquest.com/openview/7736d43c21964550dd1ccb1c78528fb8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819044
Bould, M. (2007). On the Boundary between Oneself and the Other:
Aliens and Language in the Films “AVP”, “Dark City”, “The Brother from Another Planet”, and “Possible Worlds”. The Yearbook of English Studies, 37(2), 234-254.
Brinded, N. (2014). Exceptionalist discourse and the colonization of sublime spaces: Alfonso Cuarón’s Gravity, Ridley Scott’s Prometheus and Thomas Cole’s The Oxbow. European Journal of American Culture, 33(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejac.33.3.223_1
Burns, C. L. (2001). Erasure: Alienation, Paranoia, and the Loss of Memory in The X-Files. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies, 15(3), 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-15-3_45-195
Cameron, J. (Director). (1986). Aliens [película]. 20th Century Fox.
Christol, F. (2011). Le gore, modalité virale du cinéma hollywoodien. Cinémas, 20(2-3), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.7202/045146ar
Claydon, E. A. (2007). The Projected Man: The B-Movie and the Monstrous-Masculine. Extrapolation, 48(3), 482-492. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2007.48.3.7
Cohen, P. (2011). Cowboys Die Hard: Real Men and Businessmen in the Reagan-Era Blockbuster. Film & History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Film and Television Studies, 41(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1353/flm.2011.0024
Coyle, R. (2010). Point of audition: Sound and music in Cloverfield. Science Fiction Film & Television, 3(2), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2010.15
Csicsery-Ronay, I. (2007). Some Things We Know about Aliens. The Yearbook of English Studies, 37(2), 1-23.
Dassanowsky, R. (2001). A Mountain of a Ship: Locating the “Bergfilm” in James Cameron’s “Titanic”. Cinema Journal, 40(4), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2001.0012
Davis, M. (2000). What’s the story mother? Abjection and Anti-Feminism in Alien and Aliens. Gothic Studies, 2(2), 245-256. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.7227/GS.2.2.5
Dedman, S. (2010). “Murder in the Air”: The Quest for the Death Ray. Extrapolation, 51(1), 113-133. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA228121582&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00145483&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E19df7d02
Dehon, J. P. (1994). La conception antique de l’originalite et le cinema americain contemporain. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 27(3), 1-18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24775766
Eberle-Sinatra, M. (2005). Exploring Gothic Sexuality. Gothic Studies, 7(2), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.7227/GS.7.2.2
Edwards, M. (2004). The Blonde with the Guns: Barb Wire and the “Implausible” Female Action Hero. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 32(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.3200/JPFT.32.1.39
Etxeberria, J. G. (2008). Metamorphosing Worlds in the Cinema of the Fantastic. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1396
Ewen, S. y Ewen, E. (2008). Typecasting. On the Arts and Sciences of Human Inequality. Nueva York: Seven Stories Press.
Fincher, D. (Director). (1992). Alien 3 [película]. 20th Century Fox.
Freedman, C. (2015). 2001, l’Odyssée de l’espace de Kubrick et la possibilité d’un cinéma de science-fiction. ReS Futurae, 5. https://doi.org/10.4000/resf.561
Grafius, B. R. (2016). Mama and Kristeva: Matricide in the Horror Film. Post Script, 36(1), 52-63. https://search.proquest.com/openview/95091d0c79ea006e625bae0e26345af2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=44598
Greven, D. (2010). Demeter and Persephone in Space. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 52. https://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc52.2010/GrevenAliens/index.html
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hantke, S. (2003). In the Belly of the Mechanical Beast: Technological Environments in the Alien Films. The Journal of Popular Culture, 36(3), 518-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5931.00020
Hobby, T. S. (2000). Independence Day: reinforcing patriarchal myths about gender and power. The Journal of Popular Culture, 34(2), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.2000.3402_39.x
Hoffman, A. R. (2011). How to see the horror: the hostile fetus in Rosemary’s Baby and Alien. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 22(3), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2011.596386
Hutnyk, J. (2005). Hybridity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280021
Jackson, S. (2009). Terrans, extraterrestrials, warriors and the last (wo)man standing. African Identities, 7(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725840902808900
Jameson, F. (1988). The Ideologies of Theory. Essays 1971-1986. Volume 2: The Syntax of History. Londres: Routledge.
Jeunet, J. P. (Director). (1997). Alien Resurrection [película]. 20th Century Fox, Brandywine Productions.
Kammerer, D. (2012). Surveillance in literature, film and television. En D. Lyon, K. D. Haggerty & K. Ball (eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. Londres: Routledge.
Kerry, S. (2009). There’s Genderqueers on the Starboard Bow: the pregnant male in Star Trek. The Journal of Popular Culture, 42(4), 699-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2009.00703.x
Koven, M. J. (2003). Folklore studies and popular film and television: A necessary critical survey. Journal of American Folklore, 116(460), 176-195. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.2003.0027
Krämer, P. (1998). Women First: ‘Titanic’ (1997), action-adventure films and Hollywood’s female audience. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 18(4), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439689800260421
Labarre, N. (2014). Alien as a comic book: adaptation and genre shifting. Extrapolation, 55(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2014.6
Lev, P. (1998). Whose future? “Star Wars,” “Alien,” and “Blade Runner”. Literature/Film Quarterly, 26(1), 30-37. https://sites.middlebury.edu/coldwarculture/files/2017/11/Lev_Whose_Future_Star_Wars_Alien_Balde_Runner.pdf
Lopez-Cruz, R. A. (2012). Mutations and metamorphoses: body horror is biological horror. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 40(4), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2012.654521
Lynteris, C. (2016). The epidemiologist as culture hero: visualizing humanity in the age of “the next pandemic”. Visual Anthropology, 29(1), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2016.1108823
Maderspacher, F. (2006). Aliens ─ As we know them. Current Biology, 16(1), R9-R11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.021
McCullough, J. (2001). The exile of professionals: John Glenn, Planet of the Apes and 2001: A Space Odyssey. Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 10(2), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjfs.10.2.36
Mccutcheon, M. A. (2007). Techno, Frankenstein and copyright. Popular Music, 26(2), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143007001225
McDaniel, J. (2016). You can point a finger at a zombie. Sometimes they fall off: Contemporary zombie films, embedded ableism, and disability as metaphor. The Midwest Quarterly, 57(4), 423-446. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA459487455&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00263451&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ebef00596
McWilliam, D. (2015). Beyond the mountains of madness: Lovecraftian cosmic horror and posthuman creationism in Ridley Scott’s “Prometheus” (2012). Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 26(3), 531-545. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26321174
Nowell, R. (2011). There’s more than one way to lose your heart: The American film industry, early teen slasher films, and female youth. Cinema Journal, 51(1), 115-140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41342285
Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s knowledge: essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pegg, D. (2013). Prometheus. Journal of Religion & Film, 17(2), 1-4. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol17/iss2/17/
Penley, C.; Lyon, E.; Spiegel, L. y Bergstrom, J. (1991). Close encounters: Film, Feminism, and science fiction. University of Minnesota University Press.
Phillips, G. D. (1998). Exiled in Eden: Screen versions of Conrad’s “Nostromo”. Literature/Film Quarterly, 26(4), 288-295. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43796863
Pop, D. (2018). Replicant theologies of the early robocene or the covenant of procreating replicants, cybernetic fertility and divine androids. Caietele Echinox, 34, 132-142. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=640158
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, J. G. (2013). Don’t it make my black face blue: race, avatars, albescence, and the transnational imaginary. The Journal of Popular Culture, 46(1), 192-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12021
Scott, R. (Director). (2017). Alien Convenant [película]. Brandywine Productions.
Scott, R. (Director). (2012). Prometheus [película]. Brandywine Productions.
Scott, R. (Director). (1979). Alien [película]. Brandywine Productions, 20th Century Fox.
Seidman, S. (2017). Contested Knowledge. Social Theory Today. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Selisker, S. (2015). The Bechdel test and the social form of character networks. New Literary History, 46(3), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2015.0024
Spillman, L. (2020). What is Cultural Sociology? Londres: Polity Press.
Thomson, M. (1997). Legislating for the Monstrous: Access to Reproductive Services and the Monstrous Feminine. Social & Legal Studies, 6(3), 401-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399700600305
Tigges, W. (2017). A woman like you? Emma Peel, Xena: Warrior Princess, and the empowerment of female heroes of the silver screen. The Journal of Popular Culture, 50(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12527
Whitebrook, M. (1996). Taking the narrative turn: what the novel has to offer political theory. En J. Horton and A. Baumeister (eds.), Literature and the Political Imagination. Londres: Routledge.
Wilcox, L. (2017). Drones, swarms and becoming-insect: feminist utopias and posthuman politics. Feminist Review, 116(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0071-x
Williams, R. (2001). Cultura y sociedad. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Williams, T. (2016). Arrival of the Fittest. Cultural Studies Review, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v22i2.4580
Wilson, L. (2012). Race, The Other and Resident Evil. Ethnicity and Race in a Changing World: A Review Journal, 3(2), 35. https://ercw.openlibrary.manchester.ac.uk/index.php/ercw/article/download/69/65
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/Pk.a12n22.667
PAAKAT: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, año 14, número 27, septiembre 2024- febrero de 2025, es una publicación electrónica semestral editada por la Universidad de Guadalajara, a través de Centro Universitario de Guadalajara. Calle Guanajuato. Núm. 1045; Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. Tels. 33 31 34 22 22. Dirección electrónica: http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/paakat/index.php/paakat. Correo electrónico:paakat@cugdl.udg.mx paakat.asistente.editorial@cugdl.udg.mx Editor responsable: Dr. Lázaro Marcos Chávez Aceves. Número de Reserva de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo del Título de la versión electrónica: 04-2011-111117155600-203, e-ISSN: 2007-3607, otorgados por el Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. Responsable de la última actualización de este número: Centro Universitario de Guadalajara, Lázaro Marcos Chávez Aceves. Fecha de la última modificación: 1 de Diciembre de 2024.
Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no necesariamente reflejan la postura del editor de la publicación.
Esta obra está bajo Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
